Menu
 

Search abstracts


Exploring accredited pharmacists’ pharmacovigilance work processes during home medicines reviews

  • At: 2018 FIP Congress in Glasgow (Scotland)
  • Type: Presentation
  • By: PATOUNAS, Marea (Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia)
  • Co-author(s): Marea Patounas: Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
    Lisa Nissen: Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
    Esther Lau: Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
    Gregory Kyle: Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
    Debbie Rigby: Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
    Vincent Chan: Pharmacy, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia;Faculty of Health, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
  • Abstract:

    Background

    The Home Medicines Review (HMR) Programme is funded by the Australian government1to enhance patient health and medicines management via accredited pharmacist (AP) and general practitioner collaboration. Little is known about APs’ HMR work processes regarding adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting.

    Methods

    Data was collected from AP

    ..

  • The access to the whole abstract and the presentation file is available to FIP members and to congress participants of that specific congress. Please login
Last update 13 May 2019

FIP Congresses